More than 30 executives of the performing arts in Great Britain, including the bosses of the National Theater, Opera North and the Royal Albert Hall, have joined the choir of the creative industry concerns with regard to the government’s plans to use artificial intelligence companies without permission.
In an explanation, they said that organizations for performing arts depend on a “fragile ecosystem” on freelancers who rely on copyright rights to maintain their livelihood. They also asked the government to support the “moral and economic rights” of the creative community in music, dance, drama and opera.
The 35 signatories of the explanation include the managing directors of the Sadler’s Wells Dance Theater, the Royal Shakespeare Company, the city of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra and the Leeds Playhouse.
“We take many in the creative community to express our concern about the government’s plans to reduce creative copyright law by freed AI company,” the statement said. “Our community of highly qualified creative workers rely on a fragile ecosystem freelance creative, many of which rely on copyright to maintain their practice, and most have spent many decades to improve their craft.”
Related: Why are creative people fight against the British government’s AI proposals for copyright rights?
The bosses of the performing arts added that they found progress in technology and were “participants” in innovations, but stated that the government’s plans undermined their ability to participate in the development and use of AI.
In the declaration, the ministers were asked to assert the automatic right of a creative specialist on their work instead of promoting a proposal to grant AI company access to creative work, unless the owners of the copyrights decide from the process. Critics of the opt -out plan described him as unfair and impractical.
The bosses of the performing arts also called for the government to impose transparency tasks in which the copyright protected material was included in their models and how they were acquired. The government proposed transparency requirements in its copyright advice.
“The mere miracle of music, drama, dance and opera of world class is for the joy of being people.
The government’s suggestions met with a wave of criticism from leading numbers in the British creative industries, including Sir Paul McCartney, Kate Bush and Richard Osman.
Generative AI models, the term for technology that underpins powerful tools such as the chattchatbot, are trained on a variety of data to generate your answers. The main source for this material is on the open web, which contains a variety of data from the content of Wikipedia to newspaper articles and online book archives.
A government spokesman said that the status quo in the relationship between AI and copyright had “held the creative industry, the media and AI sector from exploiting their full potential – and this cannot go on”. The government said its new approach protects “the interests of both the AI developer and the rights holder and provides a solution that enables both to be able to thrive.